Categories: Entertainment

'Top Gun: Maverick' copyright claim against Paramount rejected by US appeals court

By Jonathan Stempel Jan 2 (Reuters) – A federal appeals court ruled on Friday that the 2022 Tom Cruise blockbuster "Top Gun: Maverick" did not infringe a magazine article that inspired the original 1986 "Top Gun" film. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Pasadena, California said "Maverick," from Paramount Pictures, was not substantially similar to "Top Guns," a 1983 article by Ehud Yonay about the U.S. Navy's Top Gun fighter pilot training school in San Diego.  Yonay gave Paramount rights to his article that year for the original "Top Gun," and was credited in the film. His widow Shosh Yonay and son Yuval Yonay, heirs to his copyright, terminated the license in 2020 and said they deserved some profits from "Maverick," whose $1.5 billion worldwide gross is the 14th highest ever according to Box Office Mojo. "Maverick" is also Cruise's highest-grossing film. Lawyers for the Yonays did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Paramount, part of Paramount Skydance, said it was pleased that the appeals court "recognized that plaintiffs' claims were completely without merit." The Yonays, both from Israel, said "Maverick" shared plot, character, dialogue and thematic elements with "Top Guns," with both works depicting "what it takes to be the best of the best in fighter aviation." The three-judge appeals court panel said "Maverick" contained many significant plot elements not in "Top Guns," including a romantic subplot and Cruise's character, Navy Captain Pete "Maverick" Mitchell, returning to train younger pilots. It also said the Yonays described both works at "such a high level of abstraction" that the alleged similarities were not protectable. "Their claim of substantial similarity fails because what is protected is not similar, and what is similar is not protected," Circuit Judge Eric Miller wrote. The panel added that Paramount was not required to credit Ehud Yonay in "Maverick" because his 1983 agreement did not cover the film. Friday's decision upheld an April 2024 dismissal by U.S. District Judge Percy Anderson in Los Angeles. Paramount is also defending against a lawsuit in New York by screenwriter Shaun Gray, who said he wrote several scenes that appeared in "Maverick" and deserves some of its profits. Jury selection is scheduled for March 9. (Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Bill Berkrot)

(The article has been published through a syndicated feed. Except for the headline, the content has been published verbatim. Liability lies with original publisher.)

Indianews Syndication

Recent Posts

Trivial Chapter Opens the Door to a Secure, Luxury Lifestyle in Europe for Indian Families

New Delhi [India], January 6: Europe is fast emerging as a preferred destination for Indian…

1 hour ago

Scientists calculate true carbon footprint of premium dog foods

London (PA Media/dpa) - Dogs fed on premium, meat-rich pet food can have a bigger dietary…

5 hours ago

Study shows what kinds of food may help slow prostate cancer growth

London (PA Media/dpa) - A diet rich in vegetables and probiotics could help slow the growth…

15 hours ago

Top 10 video games of 2025: Indie dominates a year overshadowed by AI

In a year dominated by indie games, 2025 showcased the power of human creativity in…

15 hours ago

Free-floating planet drifting through space tracked by scientists

Beijing (dpa) - A free-floating planet drifting through space is being closely followed by scientists…

16 hours ago

HSG's continuation fund to value ByteDance at up to $370 billion, sources say

By Kane Wu HONG KONG, Jan 7 (Reuters) - Venture capital firm HSG, formerly Sequoia…

16 hours ago